Wednesday, October 26, 2011
New Insights and Their Implications
Eled 330-blog 2
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Summary and Synthesis
Saturday, October 22, 2011
New Insight and Implications
Summary and Synthesis
Since my last post, I have learned a great deal about teaching mathematics. My whole life, I have understood mathematics through minimal implications, connections, and relevance. I was taught mathematics in chunks instead of a whole. This teaching methodology is completely off base and needs to be changed. Through this course, I have learned that mathematics needs to be planned in a cohesive manner so that students have an in-depth knowledge of topics that can be used to have full understanding of future concepts. One way that I learned this topic was from the mean activity. It opened my eyes to see that one simplistic concept in mathematics can connect to more complex concepts that will be taught in the future. I also learned this from the most recent LPU. The students who completed doing the LPU did an excellent job at describing the reasons of WHY we divide fractions the way we do and what the purpose is of it. Doing this, placed relevancy of the topic to my life. Since the last blog, we have also learned about area. Area to me, has always been an easy concept because I was given a formula and numbers were plugged in and I received an answer. Through the teaching methods used in this class, I have learned that area is much more meaningful and that it has a great deal of knowledge behind it that can relate to other concepts such as volume. I have encountered some learning issues in this course. My issues arise from not understanding the material in the way that it is presented. This is not the instructors fault, nor my fault. This problem is directly derived from my past teachers approaching math education in chunks. Now that I am learning mathematics in a holistic approach, I am slightly confused because I have never seen it approached in this manner. This teaching method makes sense, it will take work on my work to make sense of the content.
Summary and Synthesis
Friday, October 21, 2011
Summary and Synthesis
New Insights and Implications
Summary and Synthesis
New Insights and Implications
New Insights and Implications
I enjoy learning new ways to teach mathematics to my future students. When I was an elementary student, I don’t remember learning the way that Dr. Reins has taught us. My teacher just gave us the algorithm and had us practice it. By not learning through manipulatives, it makes it hard for me to understand how to do everything, but when I finally grasp the concept, I know I will be able to teach my students different ways. Also it is necessary for a teacher to know why we use a certain algorithm. This way he or she can teach their students and they will truly understand.
New Insights and Implications
New Insights and Their Implications
New Insights and Implications
Summary and Synthesis
New Insights and Their Implications
After realizing how much of a difference learning a new method now, as a senior in college, can make on my math career - I can now see the importance of explaining the why you do a math problem the way you do to students, not just giving them the way to solve a problem. Having an insight of why you're doing the formulas and problems the way you are truly helps create a much deeper understanding of math that sticks with you; it is much more effective than just memorizing formulas and plugging in numbers to get answers.
Summary and Synthesis
Personal Concerns and Next Steps
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Personal concerns and the next step
Summary & Synthesis
Throughout this semester, Dr. Reins has used many methods and strategies for helping us understand that the processes and reasoning students are using to solve a problem is more important than the product. The goal is for students to practice reasoning skills in order to create a deep understanding of a math concept, understand how it relates to all other math concepts, and know how to apply the math concept in real-world contexts. Also, throughout the semester we have been discovering how manipulatives and other models can help students further explore, understand, and develop deep mathematical understanding. Particularly over the past few days, we have been learning about how to bridge the gap between symbolic math work and manipulative math work. Traditionally, many teachers will try to use one or the other to help students learn math concepts. Some teachers will only use manipulatives to help students build mathematical knowledge, but when it comes time for the students to show symbolic mathematical work on paper, the students struggle. On the other hand, some teachers simply teach the mathematical algorithms, expecting students to memorize procedures in order to “show” symbolic math work. Today, a group presented a lesson on dividing of fractions. First, the group demonstrated the mathematical algorithm and taught us why we use the algorithm the way we do. After explaining the symbolic mathematical work behind dividing fractions, the group extended the learning by having us use manipulatives to demonstrate dividing fractions. Using manipulatives provided a concrete, visual picture of how to divide fractions. By demonstrating the algorithim and then supplementing the symbolic math with manipulative work, the group was able to successfully bridge the gap between manipulative math and symbolic math. After seeing seeing how well, this process can works, I now understand more clearly what Dr. Reins meant by bridging the gap between manipulatives and symbolic math work. The most successful reasoning, problem solving, and learning occur when both are used, and I believe this is true because it is provides differentiated teaching. The more ways a teacher can activate students’ brains, the more likely students will understand the concept more fully.